A person in a suit holding a red apple against a dark background.

Celebrating Steve Jobs: The Visionary Apple Founder Who Would Have Been 71 Today

Steve Jobs remains one of the most influential tech visionaries of the modern era, and his presence still looms large over Apple’s identity, culture, and product philosophy. Had he not passed away in 2011 after his battle with cancer, Jobs would have turned 71 today—a reminder of how deeply his story is woven into the company he helped build and the industry he helped reshape.

For many people, Steve Jobs and Apple feel inseparable. The company’s origin story is the stuff of Silicon Valley legend: Jobs and Steve Wozniak launching Apple from a garage in 1976, driven by ambition, technical curiosity, and an almost stubborn belief that computers could become personal.

But Apple’s early years weren’t a straight climb to the top. By 1985, Jobs found himself in a surprisingly vulnerable position inside his own company. Power struggles intensified after Apple brought in John Sculley, a former PepsiCo executive whose leadership style and priorities increasingly clashed with Jobs’ vision. The two reportedly battled over Apple’s underperforming products at the time—particularly the Lisa and the Macintosh—and the tension turned into a defining internal showdown.

Sculley ultimately won that fight. Jobs was pushed out of the Macintosh division, and what happened next has been debated ever since. Jobs believed the board forced him out shortly afterward, while Sculley claimed Jobs chose to leave on his own. Regardless of which version a person accepts, the impact was clear: Apple’s co-founder was gone, and one of the most famous departures in tech history had just taken place.

Jobs didn’t disappear. He founded NeXT, positioning it as a high-end computer maker aimed at professional and education markets. NeXT developed advanced ideas and software, but business realities hit hard. By 1996, with NeXT struggling and unable to find the right path forward independently, Apple made a move that would later be viewed as historic: it acquired NeXT, bringing Jobs back to the company he once helped create. The homecoming happened on September 16, a date that still resonates with long-time Apple followers.

Even then, the story wasn’t finished. Apple’s troubles continued, and leadership turmoil returned. After then-CEO Gil Amelio took actions that further damaged confidence—highlighted by a major stock liquidation—the board replaced him. The result was a dramatic reversal of fortune: Steve Jobs was put back in a position to steer Apple’s future.

What followed over the next decade became one of the most studied comebacks in business and technology. Jobs’ approach—obsessive focus, tightly controlled product direction, and a willingness to bet big—eventually helped set the stage for Apple’s transformation into a global consumer-tech powerhouse. That evolution reached a historic peak in 2007 with the launch of the iPhone, a product widely credited with redefining the smartphone era and changing how people interact with technology every day.

Jobs’ legacy is still a living force inside Apple. Supporters and critics alike often compare the company’s identity before and after him, and discussions frequently center on the contrast between Jobs and current CEO Tim Cook. One common view is that Cook has had to lead while standing in Jobs’ shadow, with the company shifting from a reputation as a bold tech innovator under Jobs to a disciplined “tech perfector” under Cook—an organization that refines, optimizes, and scales ideas with unmatched operational precision.

Whether that interpretation feels fair or oversimplified, it reflects an undeniable reality: Steve Jobs remains embedded in Apple’s corporate lore. His influence continues to shape how people evaluate Apple’s decisions, product launches, and long-term direction.

And as long as Apple remains a major force in global technology, Jobs’ presence—his philosophy, his taste, his demands, and the mythology built around them—will likely remain part of the conversation.