Samsung’s S90H TVs Could Be Switching from QD-OLED to WOLED—Even in the US, Early Reviews Hint

Samsung’s 2026 OLED TV lineup is beginning to show up in retailer inventory worldwide, and the first hands-on impressions of the new S95H and S90H series are already stirring up debate among home theater fans. Early feedback suggests the flagship S95H is once again positioning itself as a serious candidate for one of the best OLED TVs of the year. The bigger surprise, though, is happening in the more “affordable” S90H range—where a set of changes could leave QD-OLED enthusiasts disappointed.

For several generations, the Samsung S90 series has been associated with what many buyers call a “panel lottery.” In simple terms, shoppers in many regions couldn’t always be sure which type of OLED panel they were getting. Outside of certain markets like the US and South Korea, some sizes were equipped with QD-OLED panels, while other sizes used WOLED panels sourced from LG. In parts of Europe, for example, the 65-inch model was often the only version commonly associated with QD-OLED, while sizes ranging from smaller options up to extra-large models typically arrived as WOLED. To make things even murkier, there were times when even the 65-inch units could show up with WOLED panels.

What’s different in 2026 is that the same uncertainty now appears to be creeping into the US market—and early testing indicates Samsung may have moved even further away from QD-OLED for the S90H series.

Reviewers who spent time with the 65-inch Samsung S90H report that their units appear to be using WOLED panels rather than QD-OLED. One reviewer, The Display Guy on YouTube, and another early review from Ecoustics both point in the same direction after hands-on use and measurements.

Ecoustics highlights a key clue: color gamut coverage. Their testing found the 65-inch S90H reaching 98.6% of the DCI-P3 color standard, which is strong and aligns with what many viewers expect from a modern premium OLED TV. However, it reportedly delivered only 74.77% of the wider BT.2020 color gamut. That lower BT.2020 performance doesn’t automatically ruin real-world viewing—most content today still targets P3—but it can signal that the underlying panel technology is WOLED rather than QD-OLED, since QD-OLED models are often associated with stronger wide-gamut color volume.

There’s another change that could impact day-to-day viewing: the screen finish. According to The Display Guy, the S90H now uses a matte coating. If accurate, that would mean every Samsung OLED TV in the 2026 lineup is using a matte finish this year. Matte screens can help reduce reflections in bright rooms, but they’re also controversial among OLED purists who prefer the perceived contrast and “pop” that glossy coatings can deliver in controlled lighting.

Adding to the uncertainty, there’s speculation that some S90H sizes may be using older-generation WOLED panels rather than the newest multi-layer designs appearing in competing 2026 OLED models. The Display Guy suggests that at least the 42-inch and 83-inch versions could be based on 2025 WOLED panel tech, and he notes his 65-inch unit was a pre-production sample—leaving open the possibility that retail units could differ. Still, the broader takeaway is clear: buyers may need to pay closer attention than ever to exactly what hardware they’re getting.

The pricing conversation is where the controversy really heats up. Reportedly, most S90H models are seeing around a $200 price increase versus last year’s launch pricing. That would place the 65-inch model at about $2,700 instead of $2,500. For shoppers who choose the S90 line expecting QD-OLED advantages, a higher price combined with a possible shift to WOLED panels is a tough sell—and it raises obvious questions about value.

For anyone shopping Samsung’s 2026 OLED TVs, the early message is simple: the S95H looks like the safer bet if you’re specifically chasing top-tier panel performance, while the S90H may require extra homework before you buy. If you care about QD-OLED in particular, verifying panel type by size and region—whenever possible—could matter more this year than it ever has before.