NVIDIA Executive Denies Signing Viral Letter Calling for Jensen Huang’s Return
A senior NVIDIA executive has pushed back against a viral letter circulating online that claims several top company leaders are urging the board to bring back Jensen Huang. Bryan Catanzaro, NVIDIA’s vice president of applied deep learning research, publicly stated that the letter is fake and that he had no involvement in it.
The situation has drawn major attention across the technology and artificial intelligence sectors, largely because Huang has long been seen as one of the most influential figures in AI hardware, GPU computing, and accelerated data center technology. Any uncertainty around his role at NVIDIA naturally sparks intense debate, especially at a time when the company remains central to the global AI boom.
The alleged letter, which gained traction on social media, appeared to include the names of several prominent NVIDIA leaders. It claimed that executives were shocked by Huang’s departure and were calling on the company’s board to reverse course. Some versions of the post even suggested that employees could take dramatic action if the board did not respond.
However, Catanzaro made it clear that the document should not be taken seriously.
“There is a made-up letter circulating online asking NVIDIA’s board to reinstate Jensen, claiming my involvement. This letter is obviously fake, and even if it were real I would not sign it,” he said.
Catanzaro added that he was deeply saddened by Huang no longer being with NVIDIA, but emphasized that he supports the company’s board and trusts its decisions. He also expressed confidence in Colette Kress, NVIDIA’s interim CEO, calling her an extraordinary leader and saying she has his full support.
His statement is important because the fake letter attempted to create the impression that NVIDIA’s senior leadership was united against the board. By directly denying involvement, Catanzaro has helped weaken the credibility of the viral document and clarify his own position during a highly sensitive moment for the company.
The controversy follows reports that a large number of NVIDIA employees voiced support for Huang on internal company communication channels. NVIDIA has tens of thousands of employees worldwide, with a significant portion working in research and development. Given Huang’s long association with the company’s culture, innovation strategy, and product direction, it is not surprising that his departure would trigger strong emotional reactions inside and outside the company.
Huang has been widely credited with helping turn NVIDIA from a graphics chip company into one of the most important forces in artificial intelligence. Under his leadership, NVIDIA’s GPUs became essential for training large AI models, powering data centers, and supporting high-performance computing workloads. The company’s technology is now used across cloud computing, autonomous systems, scientific research, robotics, and generative AI.
That legacy makes the question of leadership especially significant. Investors, developers, AI researchers, and enterprise customers are watching closely to see how NVIDIA manages the transition. The company’s future decisions around chip supply, AI accelerator roadmaps, data center partnerships, and manufacturing capacity could have major implications for the broader technology market.
Colette Kress, now serving as interim CEO, is no stranger to NVIDIA’s operations. She has spent more than a decade at the company and has frequently appeared alongside Huang during earnings calls and investor briefings. Her experience with NVIDIA’s financial strategy, supply chain planning, and business execution gives her a strong foundation as the company navigates a period of uncertainty.
Still, replacing or succeeding a leader as closely identified with a company as Jensen Huang is never simple. Huang was not only the public face of NVIDIA but also a key strategic voice in the rise of accelerated computing and AI infrastructure. His ability to explain long-term technology trends helped shape market confidence in NVIDIA’s direction.
Outside the company, several figures in the artificial intelligence community have expressed support for Huang. Leaders from AI software and open-source technology circles have praised his impact on the industry and highlighted NVIDIA’s role in enabling modern AI development.
At the same time, Catanzaro’s response shows that public support for Huang does not necessarily mean opposition to NVIDIA’s board or its interim leadership. His comments suggest that while emotions remain high, key executives may still be focused on stability, continuity, and confidence in the company’s next steps.
The fake letter also highlights how quickly misinformation can spread during major corporate transitions, particularly when the company involved plays such a central role in a fast-moving industry like artificial intelligence. A document that appears official or includes recognizable names can quickly gain momentum online, even before its authenticity is verified.
For NVIDIA, the priority now will be maintaining trust among employees, customers, developers, and investors. The company remains a dominant player in AI chips, GPUs, accelerated computing, and data center infrastructure. Its next moves will be closely watched as the AI market continues to expand at a rapid pace.
Catanzaro’s denial may not end speculation about NVIDIA’s leadership changes, but it does make one thing clear: the viral letter claiming his support is not legitimate. As the company moves forward under interim leadership, the focus will shift to how NVIDIA preserves its momentum in artificial intelligence while managing one of the most closely watched leadership transitions in the tech industry.
