Same Ryzen AI Max+ 395, Framework Desktop Runs More Efficiently Than the GMK EVO-X2

Framework Desktop vs GMK EVO-X2: which compact PC makes better use of power with the same AMD hardware? With both systems built around the Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Radeon 8060S, a series of real-world and synthetic tests reveals a clear pattern: the Framework Desktop consistently draws less power under load, while the GMK EVO-X2 sips a bit less at idle.

How we compared them
Both systems were tested with an external monitor to keep display power draw out of the equation. We measured average system power at the wall across heavy CPU and GPU stress tests, a productivity benchmark, a modern AAA game, and a short idle window. Ranges in parentheses reflect the lowest and highest readings observed during each run.

Key results
– Prime95 V2810 CPU stress: Framework 144.5 W average (140.1–163.4) vs GMK 184.7 W (180.5–210). Framework used about 22% less power under full CPU load.
– Cinebench R15 Multi: Framework 159.5 W (159.3–159.8) vs GMK 200 W (197.4–202). Roughly 20% lower draw for the Framework during a multi-core productivity burst.
– FurMark 1.19 GPU stress at 1280×720: Framework 138.2 W (135.3–157.4) vs GMK 181.2 W (176.8–206). About 24% less during sustained GPU load.
– Cyberpunk 2077 at 1080p Ultra, no FSR: Framework 140.6 W (138.6–142.7) vs GMK 178.1 W (174.6–184.1). Around 21% less while gaming.
– Idle, 1 minute: Framework 10.5 W (9.64–15.3) vs GMK 8.18 W (6.63–10.5). The GMK used about 22% less at idle.

What it means for buyers
– If you spend most of your time compiling code, rendering, training models, or gaming, the Framework Desktop’s much lower power draw under load can translate to cooler operation and potentially quieter fans, plus lower electricity costs over time.
– If your PC sits idle for long stretches or always runs background tasks, the GMK EVO-X2’s lower baseline draw is a small plus for 24/7 efficiency.
– Because both machines use the same Ryzen AI Max+ 395 and Radeon 8060S, the contrasts you see here come down to power tuning and platform design rather than silicon differences.

Bottom line
Under identical hardware and comparable scenarios, the Framework Desktop is the more power-thrifty choice when the system is actually working hard, trimming roughly 20–24% from wall power across CPU stress, GPU stress, productivity, and gaming. The GMK EVO-X2 counters with slightly better idle efficiency. Choose Framework for lower load power and better thermals during real work and play, or pick the GMK if your priority is the lowest idle consumption in an always-on setup.