Intel Sues Longtime Employee for Alleged Theft of ‘Top-Secret’ Data After Firing

Intel is investigating an alleged insider theft after a longtime employee was accused of taking a massive trove of company data in the days leading up to his layoff. According to a legal complaint, former staffer Jinfeng Luo, who joined the chipmaker in 2014, allegedly removed around 18,000 files containing highly confidential information from Intel’s internal systems.

The filing outlines a brief but troubling timeline. On July 23, Intel’s security controls reportedly blocked Luo when he tried to move a file from his work laptop to an external hard drive. Five days later, the company says he connected a different storage device and succeeded in downloading thousands of files. Luo’s employment officially ended on July 31 following a layoff notice.

Intel says its internal investigation tied the downloads to Luo and prompted swift legal action. The company is seeking $250,000 in damages and a court order aimed at preventing any disclosure of what it describes as “top secret” material. The complaint also notes that attempts to reach Luo at his last known address in Seattle took months, adding another twist to an already high-stakes situation.

Key details at a glance:
– Alleged data taken: Approximately 18,000 files from an internal database
– Timing: Initial blocked attempt on July 23; successful download reported five days later
– Employment status: With Intel since 2014; layoff effective July 31
– Legal action: Lawsuit filed seeking damages and an injunction to stop any leaks
– Current status: Case ongoing; no public statement from Luo

The case underscores the growing risk of insider threats, especially during periods of organizational upheaval such as layoffs. For a company built on cutting-edge research and trade secrets, even the possibility of sensitive information leaving its walls raises serious concerns about intellectual property, competitive positioning, and regulatory exposure.

As the lawsuit proceeds, the central questions remain unresolved: what exactly was taken, who—if anyone—may have seen it, and whether the court will grant Intel’s request for an injunction and damages. For now, the matter highlights the critical importance of data loss prevention tools, rigorous access controls, and rapid response protocols when unusual activity is detected inside corporate networks.