The tech world has been abuzz with the arrival of the new Exynos 2400 chip, which has become a staple in the Samsung Galaxy S24 and Galaxy S24+ models around the globe. With a history of skepticism surrounding Samsung’s in-house processors, the Exynos 2400 represents a critical opportunity for the company to prove the prowess of its technology.
Exynos 2400 Surpasses Previous Generations
Recent assessments show the Exynos 2400 eclipsing the performance benchmarks set by its predecessor, the Exynos 2200. While surpassing legacy chips is essential, outperforming industry rivals like Apple, MediaTek, and Qualcomm is the ultimate test.
Comparative GPU Performance: Exynos 2400 vs. Peers
In the highly regarded 3DMark Solar Bay ray tracing benchmark test, the Exynos 2400 shines, scoring a remarkable 8,642 points and demonstrating energy efficiency by consuming just 9.3W of power. This efficiency and power edge put it ahead of the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, which scored 8,601 points with a higher power intake of 11.7W. Powered by the Xclipse 940 GPU that leverages AMD’s RDNA 3 architecture, the Exynos 2400 is favorably positioned for ray tracing in gaming applications. These tests, conducted by YouTuber Golden Reviewer, confirm the chip’s capabilities.
In more traditional graphics rendering, known as rasterization, the Exynos 2400 outperforms the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 but falls slightly behind the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and MediaTek Dimensity 9300 in the 3DMark Wildlife Extreme benchmark. Furthermore, it is more power-efficient than the Dimensity 9300, albeit less so than both the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 and Gen 3, suggesting significant enhancements from the Exynos 2200 era.
Exploring the GFXBench 3.1 (1080p) domain, the Exynos 2400 surpasses the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, though trailing behind the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 and Dimensity 9300. Its energy efficiency rivals that of the Apple A16 Bionic and outperforms the Dimensity 9300, placing it on par with the Dimensity 9200 and Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1.
Under the Grafikbenchmark Aztec Vulkan (used for Android) and Metal (for Apple devices), the Exynos fares better than the Apple A16 Bionic, Dimensity 9200, and Snapdragon 8 Gen 2, while still lagging behind the Dimensity 9300 and Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. Nonetheless, the efficiency of the Exynos 2400 is noteworthy, almost identical to that of the Dimensity 9200, superior to the Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1, and nearly double that of its forebears, the Exynos 2100 and 2200.
In essence, the Exynos 2400 has illustrated its strengths, particularly in ray tracing, by outperforming contemporaries and maintaining better energy control. As it stands, Samsung’s new chipset has clearly marked the areas of further improvement for its next iteration, especially in rasterization performance, where it aims to redefine efficiency within the competitive tech landscape.
